Herland: Connection to Definition of American Literature

For many years, scholars, historians, and philosophers have engaged in heated debates concerning the topic of American literature, eager to define what many claim to be a formidable task. But what exactly makes American literature such a formidable task? So difficult to understand? American literature is a growing genre, spanning over the course of centuries across a vast plain that was and is commonly referred to as the west. It is confined by vague boundaries; lines addressing the temporal as well as physical borders. Does it begin during the precolonial era, when oral tradition was popular among the natives? It is characterized by where it was written (location) or by its content that might relate to American ideologies? These kinds of questions leave many scholars and historians stumped, unable to continue their definition with clear, "scientific" evidence. In order to answer these questions, they will often team up and compose their own original solution, accustomed to their group's or their own beliefs. However, with these individual responses, many of the solutions remain in constant debate with one another. Reasons for such controversy can be found lying within the rapidly evolving, highly influential, dynamic American culture. Literature pertaining to a country is a product of its history, culture, and overall motive.

By re-evaluating the historical context of America's foundation, one may truly understand the culture and ultimately the literature that was derived from it. Modernism, as we have discussed many times before, was a monumental step in the development of western literature. It is characterized by optimism, where the average human has the ability to manipulate and reshape their surroundings despite their social standing and common troubles. When Charlotte Gilman first wrote "Herland," she pictured precisely this, a place that had been perfected due to unremitting criticism, one that welcomed scrutiny and correction. The Utopian trait of the civilization recurs often to fully establish what women are capable of. While describing the organization and landscape, Gilman writes: "Everything was beauty, order, perfect cleanness, and the pleasantest sense of home over it all" (16). She strengthens the idea of a utopia by characterizing its inhabitants: "These were merely athletic--light and powerful. College professors, teachers, writers--many women showed similar intelligence but often wore a strained nervous look, while these we as calm as cows, for all their evident intellect" (19). Gilman finalizes and verifies the idea of the feminist utopia upon Vandyck's revelation and acceptance of gender equality. She writes, "[w]e had expected a dull submissive monotony, and found a daring social inventiveness far beyond our own...  We had expected pettiness, and found a social consciousness beside which our nations looked like quarreling children... We had expected jealously, and found a broad sisterly affection... We had expected hysteria, and found a standard of health and vigor..." (69). With such evidence, Gilman's intention to envision a utopia is obvious and a phenomenal representation of modernist philosophy. "Herland" could easily be used within my Definition of American literature.

Herland: Connection to In-Class Text

Over the course of this (third) quarter, the English II class has thoroughly discussed the many defining characteristics of realism. I, on both my own time and class time, have explored a diversity of pieces, ranging from the jovial adventures of Huckleberry Finn to the crude vulgarity of McTeague. Realism, as discussed before, focuses on accurate depictions of life, paying heavy attention towards the dull truth behind society. It is characterized by its lack of exaggeration as well as any form of distortion; the style's foundation lies within the author's ability to perceive reality as it truly and honestly exists. In contrast with other literary styles, the writing is upfront, obvious, and somewhat pessimistic. This style revolves around plausibility and grounded ideas to further enhance the realistic feel. In "Herland," Charlotte Gilman envisions a utopia, one devoid of crime, pollution, war, and, more importantly, men. Modernist writing, as demonstrated in this book, greatly contrasts with realism, exercising optimism in virtually every way. Its underlying philosophy is a product of its history (1920s - "Roarin' 20s") and had a profound influence on the American culture. Modernist thought was "driven by a concious desire to overturn traditional modes of representation and express the new sensibilities of their time" (Wikipedia). Thus, having only revealed conflict and contrast in my research, finding a close relative of "Herland" became a daunting challenge. I revisited the texts, skimmed through the pages, delved deeper into the content, and tried to uncover themes and potential similarities. As I spent more time with the stories, I drew one significant connection between "McTeague: A Story of San Francisco" and "Herland," using realism as a bridge to relate such differing styles.

Trina Sieppe is a girl seemingly unblemished by society's harm and quite literally resembles innocence. She is characterized by a humble life where she dwells in the comfort of simplicity and financial freedom, finding completely pleasure through the jovial youth of picnics and daily trips. However, all of her preceding childhood and happiness is washed away by one lucky draw that many would say is only a fantasy. Winning the lottery marks the decline of Trina's role in life and importance in the eyes of the other characters. Marcus, her cousin and ex-lover, grows agitated upon finding this information, feeling cheated, as if Trina's heart was stolen from him. With complete disregard to her feelings and significance, he approaches McTeague with demands, run by an adrenaline of fury and aggression. Marcus, like a child whining to its mother, exclaimed in regret: "[a]ll I know is that I've been soldiered out of five thousand dollars" (111). Marcus first addresses the monetary value of Trina before the value of her character, putting a heavy emphasis on the importance (and role) of women. Shortly after, she is denigrated to virtually nothing: "'If  I had my rights,' cried Marcus, bitterly, 'I'd have part of that money. It's my due--it's only justice'" (111). Norris's use of the word "rights" illustrates Marcus's complete intention to "own" Trina , which in turn hints towards male dominance and female inferiority.

As the story progresses in McTeague, the severity of their comments increase and the implication of female inferiority becomes clearly evident. Charlotte Gilman, in her book, "Herland," applies the same stereotype to the story but immediately rebukes it with strong contrasts. In doing so, she continues this trend of unjustified female inferiority. Her portrayal of the male characters, shallow and judgmental, are merely a representation of the entire gender as she see it. Through their voice, Gilman establishes misconceptions concerning the female role in society as well as their suppressed potential. In "Herland," the three stooges (as I like to call them), Jeff Margrave, Terry Nicholson, and Vandyck Jennings, explore a vast, unknown territory populated by only women. Despite having several degrees in their own specialties, the group is naive and poorly suited for this expedition, with strong underestimations of female authority. Their ignorance coupled with their narcissism lead to gender prejudice and the introduction of stereotypical comments. For example, Terry jokes with his friends and subtlety hints towards his own superiority: "'You'll see,' he insisted, 'I'll get solid with them all--and play one bunch against the other. I'll get myself elected king in no time--whew! Solomon will have to take a back seat!'" (7). The narrator even associates sophisticated civilization and order with manhood: "'But they look--why, this is a civilized country!' [Vandyck] protested. 'There must be men'" (10). These comments, though very general, are key ideas in the development of Gilman's intention to create the stereotype. Over the course of the book, the men continuously question the women's potential and ultimately grow a liking to their culture and efficiency.